Aug 31, 2016 12:00:00 AM
Take in that disconnect for second. What this tells me is that the public and parents believe it’s “extremely or very important” for schools to prepare students to develop good work habits, to think critically across subject areas, and to provide the factual information they need. The problem is, the public and parents don’t think local schools are doing “extremely well or very well” in giving students what they need in those areas. Rather, they think schools are doing just OK with this. “Somewhat well” was the most common response, given by about 40 percent across the five priorities. Guess what? "Somewhat well" is not good enough. It means you probably shouldn't be giving your local schools As and Bs. I’m also struck by the willingness of folks to pay higher property taxes for their schools, even when they are not certain they will get a return on their investment. If you look at just the people who said they are not confident more tax money would improve schools, more than a third of those said they would still support higher taxes for schools. Huh? There is also an interesting racial divide that popped up in the PDK poll, and it mirrors the rhetoric we see around the opt-out movement. White parents are far more sensitive about their kids feeling stressed out at school, and they are far less likely to see themselves as the cause of that academic pressure. As the PDK analysis mentions:
White parents are 17 points more likely than nonwhites to think their child feels too much pressure (31% to 14%), but they’re less apt to feel that they’re the cause of it (30% vs. 49%). Instead, they’re 17 points more likely to attribute the pressure to their child’s teachers (26% to 9%).Not surprising at all, but still illuminating: Worrying about too much academic pressure is a luxury rarely afforded to non-White parents, who instead have to worry that their schools and teachers are underperforming and expecting too little from their children. Looking across the two polls, there are some common themes:
Tracy Dell’Angela is a writer, education nonprofit executive director and a mom passionate about education improvements. Previously, Tracy was Director of Outreach and Communications for the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) at the U.S. Department of Education in Washington, D.C. She came to IES from the University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research, which produces research that drives improvement in Chicago and nationwide. She also served as Senior Project Director for 100Kin10 at the University of Chicago and was Director of Program Investments and Partnerships for the Chicago Public Education Fund. Tracy spent most of her career as an award-winning newspaper journalist, including 12 years at the Chicago Tribune as an education reporter covering national policy and the Chicago Public Schools. A Californian by birth but a Chicagoan in spirit, Tracy attended University of Chicago as a master's student in social sciences and earned a B.A. in journalism and political science from San Diego State University.
Few issues in education spark more tension and debate than standardized testing. Are they a tool for equity or a burden on students? A necessary check on school systems or a flawed measure of...
Charter schools are public schools with a purpose. Operating independently from traditional school districts, they're tuition-free, open to all students, and publicly funded—but with more flexibility...
Despite the benefits of a diverse teaching force, prospective teachers of color fall out of our leaky preparation pipeline at every stage: preparation, hiring, induction, and retention. Here’s what...
Ed Post is the flagship website platform of brightbeam, a 501(c3) network of education activists and influencers demanding a better education and a brighter future for every child.
© 2020-2025 brightbeam. All rights reserved.
Leave a Comment