You know what? It’s a real shame that people can’t seem to separate politics from public service. Because if one more person comes on one of my social media pages trying to argue down my stance on this latest Chicago Teachers Union strike, I might be compelled to pop off.
As I’ve done since the 2012 strike, I start calling B.S. on the union—not teachers—and here come the red shirt avengers to defend teachers’ rights, needs and their beloved union.
Listen, I know and understand that the teachers are striking for smaller class sizes, more support staff and pay. And for the umpteenth time, I support good teachers and believe that they should be well compensated and work in comfortable school environments. After all, they’re public servants—they do the very difficult and selfless work of ensuring our kids are academically successful.
So, teachers, I’m not talking about y’all. Please have a seat—preferably at your desks so our kids can go to school.
But I am talking about union leadership because nothing will convince me that they’re primarily striking just for educator and student needs.
Don’t get me wrong, they support and protect their teachers—good and bad—but their motivations are driven by increasing membership and power. They’re politicians.
Look, I’ll give it to ‘em, their messaging is very effective—and it would work on anyone who’s unaware of the union’s fickle stance on other social justice issues impacting the students for whom they claim to advocate.
Why aren’t they working with their teachers to reconcile concerns around implicit bias that parent Natasha Dunn says is hindering her kids in schools? Isn’t that a big social justice issue?
With such concern for south and west side families who endure the most disparities, did they consult any of those parents? Or did they just survey those who are part of community-based organizations they donate money to for standby advocacy?
Because south-side parent Willie Preston opposes the strike due to concerns about it interrupting the flow of his son’s first year in high school.
As if we all aren’t drowning under Chicago’s ridiculous taxes and high costs of living!
Who’s going to relieve the rest of us from our bills? Better yet, what students will teachers have to teach when more Black families join the more than 300,000 who have already left because they can’t afford to pay taxes, pensions and $100,000 salaries for teachers? How is that social justice?
In 2012, people were red shirt fanatics—but not me. And I’m glad people are wising up to the games because when it comes down to it, this is a political strike orchestrated by the union.
But just because more and more people aren’t drinking the Kool-Aid, that doesn’t mean we don’t want what’s best for teachers. We can support our public servants and fight the politics that ultimately undermine the interests of our communities.
So from here out, we’re not going to allow our kids to be used as pawns, our communities to be drained of schools and resources or our voices dismissed because we’re not classroom educators.
Tanesha Peeples is driven by one question in her work—“If not me, then who?” As the former Deputy Director of Activist Development for brightbeam, Tanesha merges the worlds of communications and grassroots activism to push for change in the public education system. Her passion for community and relentless mission for justice and liberation drive her in uplifting and amplifying the voices and ...