Logo
Donate
Logo
Donate

This New Report Is Fighting Charter School and Special Education Myths With Facts

Mar 7, 2018 12:00:00 AM

by Maureen Kelleher

To hear tell from charter opponents, students with disabilities and charters don’t mix. Their story about charters and special-needs students is simple: Charter schools don’t enroll many students with disabilities. When they do, they are more likely to kick them out than traditional public schools. This is because they can’t serve them well. But a new report analyzing federal data says otherwise. As of the 2014 school year, about 10 percent of students in U.S. charter schools were eligible for special education services, compared to about 12.5 percent in public schools—not a huge gap. And charter schools were more likely to serve their special education students in the regular classroom, complying with federal law that specifies students with special needs should have those needs met in the “least restrictive environment.” About 84 percent of charter students receiving special education services spent most of their day in regular classrooms, compared with 68 percent of students receiving special education services in traditional public schools. The study was published in late February by the National Center for Special Education in Charter Schools, an independent nonprofit founded to ensure diverse learners can access and thrive in charter schools. Their analysis was based on the most recent data collected by the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights, which tracks enrollment, service provision and discipline data for students in special education.

‘Some Kids Are Simply Disciplined More,’ No Matter the School Setting

As for discipline, students in special education continue to face disproportionate discipline in both charters and traditional public schools. Both traditional and charter public schools suspend and expel students with disabilities at rates roughly twice that of their students overall. While both sectors have decreased their use of suspensions for all students, traditional public schools have made slightly bigger strides in reducing suspensions. However, [pullquote position="right"]charter schools have made slightly more progress in reducing expulsions.[/pullquote] Although the amount of change is small, between 2012 and 2014 the expulsion gap between general and special education students narrowed slightly in charter schools and widened slightly in public schools. “The most recent release of the [civil rights data] confirms that some kids are simply disciplined more,” said Lauren Morando Rhim, executive director and co-founder of the National Center for Special Education in Charter Schools. “We must continue to track data and examine policies that may be contributing to this. We can’t teach students if we have excluded them from school.”

Charter Schools Are Succeeding With Diverse Learners

As to the argument that charter schools can’t serve special education students well, Morando Rhim was quick to differ. “There are lots of schools that are having great success with students with disabilities,” she noted, offering the Paramount School of Excellence, a charter school in Indianapolis, as an example. Paramount enrolls 700 students, 18 percent of whom have been identified with disabilities that qualify them for special education services. In 2016, only 29 percent of special education students in the Indiana Public Schools met state reading standards; at Paramount, 60 percent did. Rhim’s organization is developing five more case studies of other schools with similar results. “These schools are having success not just enrolling, but helping students make strong academic gains,” she said.
Photo by Pasco County Schools, CC-licensed.

Maureen Kelleher

Maureen Kelleher is Editorial Director at Future Ed. She was formerly Editorial Partner at Ed Post and is a veteran education reporter, a former high school English teacher, and also the proud mom of an elementary student in Chicago Public Schools. Her work has been published across the education world, from Education Week to the Center for American Progress. Between 1998 and 2006 she was an associate editor at Catalyst Chicago, the go-to magazine covering Chicago’s public schools. There, her reporting won awards from the Annie E. Casey Foundation, the International Reading Association and the Society for Professional Journalists.

Leave a Comment

The Feed

Explainers

all explainers

  • EXPLAINED: What Are Standardized Tests and Why Do We Need Them?

    Ed Post Staff

    Few issues in education spark more tension and debate than standardized testing. Are they a tool for equity or a burden on students? A necessary check on school systems or a flawed measure of...

  • Explained: What Is the Federal Charter Schools Program?

    Ed Post Staff

    Charter schools are public schools with a purpose. Operating independently from traditional school districts, they're tuition-free, open to all students, and publicly funded—but with more flexibility...

  • A Leaky Educator Pipeline Loses Teachers of Color

    Ed Post Staff

    Despite the benefits of a diverse teaching force, prospective teachers of color fall out of our leaky preparation pipeline at every stage: preparation, hiring, induction, and retention. Here’s what...

Ed Post is the flagship website platform of brightbeam, a 501(c3) network of education activists and influencers demanding a better education and a brighter future for every child.

© 2020-2025 brightbeam. All rights reserved.