If this is the path the NAACP wants to take on charters, I don’t want to know it, and I, and many others, surely won’t be walking it with them.Matt Barnum, at Chalkbeat, gives an easy-to-read breakdown of "what the NAACP is worried about, what we know about those issues, and what the group’s recommendations could mean for the charter school world." Along with the report, the NAACP presented delegates from its state and local chapters with model legislation to take home and present to lawmakers. The model bill would put a 10-year moratorium on new charter schools and put all of them under the exclusive control of traditional school districts. Beth Hawkins, digs deep into the NAACP’s New Strategy to Shut Down Charter Schools. Sharif El-Mekki shared his response to the report with The Notebook:
[It] isn’t to say that charters should not be held accountable. But to spend this much time on 7 percent of the schools in the country, while ignoring the historical and present black experience in the other 93 percent of schools should be beneath the NAACP. But unfortunately, it isn’t.
While there are certainly some charter schools serving students well, there are also a wide range of problems with the operation of charters across the country that require attention.You can check Politico for more highlights from the report. They will present on findings this afternoon and you can watch live stream here. You can also watch live from Citizen Ed. Beth Hawkins has some background to the report on The 74. Earlier this week Chris Stewart wrote a piece that can't be shared enough. I, too, hope the NAACP remembers that "7 out of 8 Black public school students in America attend traditional public schools, so it goes without saying that the traditional public school system is far more responsible than charter schools for the inequities and outcomes of Black students." And:
If the NAACP is honest, it will apply the same demands to all public schools. If it cares about the education of Black kids, it will stay focused on the inequities in the system. And if it is truly advocating for people of color, it won’t deny Black parents the right to choose schools that are educating Black children far better than traditional public schools.Here's to hoping that through this report the NAACP finds its way to respecting the choices of communities of color.
We speak of unity but where are our so-called leaders, those who have now become opportunists and criticize those who practice choice? Where do we find long lasting fights even after the cameras are gone?Also this:
The NAACP yearly dinner tickets cost what I would rather donate to a child who can’t pay for school uniforms. They only think of the elite and push agendas but then tell me my choice is indicative of racist agreement. Black on black agendas are what we have.Bernita better preach. This 21-year-old summer intern at the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools is not attacking Black leaders but crying for help.
Black leaders, I’m begging you to use your power to create. Create the schools for our children that also provide jobs for our people. Position it so that Black school leaders have the resources to train up our kids. If you are an organization with the words Black, African American, Negro, or Colored People in your title then this is your duty, this is your fight.
The NAACP was born from a marriage of convenience that has never been reconciled. White liberals and Black liberationists, like W.E.B. Du Bois, had very different visions of the role of the organization and its tactics. Those schisms are still playing out today in efforts like the misguided charter school resolution released this week.Continue to fight the good fight, Dirk!
The fact of the matter is [American Federation of Teachers President] Randi [Weingarten] is doing what she can do so that the people she represents can maintain control and power over a system.Okay, I can go on and on with how ridiculous this whole thing is but I will stop with a piece from parent activist Gwen Samuel, Rev. Al Sharpton, Let’s Talk About Your ‘Sister’ Randi. I love this piece because as parent Gwen Samuel does, she get's real with Rev. Sharpton. Okay I lied, this is the last piece. Philadelphia blogger and charter school principal Sharif El-Mekki also calls out Rev. Al Sharpton. Get this, several years ago Sharpton visited El-Mekki's charter school and had something very different to say. In a statement Sharpton proposed to coalesce around a third way narrative that demanded:
Higher learning standards,
Lifting restrictions on the growth of high-quality charter schools,
Turning around low-performing schools,
Improving principal and teacher quality, and
Greater transparency and accountability in all schools.
It would be hard to have a conversation in Atlanta about charter schools and their position against them, given the many high-performing charter schools that we have and the number of schools that are run by Black folks. No one from the NAACP, despite my lifetime membership, has ever reached out to me as a charter school leader and said, can I come and see your school? Can I understand what’s going on? How can you pretend to know what’s best for Black children when you aren’t talking to the families who are being served by these schools? Or the leaders who are running these schools?
"She never intended on enrolling Aniyah in a charter school, but with Ward 8’s poor achievement records, it was the only option. 'The public school systems just need to be revamped,' Maddox told The Daily Signal.Read the full article here. In my hometown of Atlanta, Maureen Downey at the Atlanta Journal-Constitution featured Jondré Pryor—in his ninth year as principal of KIPP South Fulton Academy and the 2016 Georgia Charter School Association Principal of the Year—who stood up in defense of his charter school that serves 93 percent African-American students with an 80 percent African-American staff. Read what Pryor told the NAACP when he attended the convention in July. In West Seattle, Shirline Wilson, one of the signers of the letter from Charters Work, says, "the NAACP is off-base because her own experience shows charter schools can be a lifeline for students of color who are poorly served by traditional public schools." Read the full article in The Lens. Kelly Amis, producer and director at TEACHED, wrote a piece on why she's calling the NAACP today. Rashad Turner, a former Black Lives Matter leader spoke out against the proposed moratorium in The Hill:
I don’t advocate privatizing the entire education system, despite what the billion dollar teachers’ union industry, NAACP, and Black Lives Matter may tell you. I’m a black father who wants the best education for my child and yours. That’s why, after leading Black Lives Matter St. Paul, Minn., I left the organization over their call to eliminate charter schools.Read the full piece here. On Education Post, Sharif El-Mekki delivers a harsh critique that the NAACP is not looking out for Black families. And Duncan Kirkwood, Western New York advocacy manager for the Northeast Charter Schools Network, urges the NAACP to not end up on the wrong side of history. In the St. Louis Business Journal, Brian A. Murphy, board president of The Children's Educational Alliance of Missouri, speaks to how public charter schools are serving his region and across the country. In addition to voices from parents, the New York Times' Editorial Board published a piece calling the NAAP's proposed moratorium " A Misguided Attack on Charter Schools." And The Washington Post suggest the NAACP needs to do its homework.
The NAACP wants to slam the door on that chance for children of color to boost their academic achievement. That’s the wrong fight for an organization that has spent more than half a century fighting for black children to get a better education.Read more of what she has to say here in The 74.
We ask for a meeting with NAACP national board representation, to take place before your fall convening, to discuss the very serious implications the proposed resolution will have for Black families who want and deserve high-quality educational options for their children.Among some of the most notable signees include, Dr. Michael Lomax, CEO of United Negro College Fund, Jacqueline Cooper, president, Black Alliance for Educational Options, and George Parker, former president, Washington Teacher’s Union. The letter was also released in conjunction with BAEO and NAPCS' new campaign ChartersWork which "tells a clear and compelling story of why more than 700,000 Black families have chosen charter schools." The campaign "will run through the end of 2016 and focus on elevating Black voices and stakeholders from the civil rights and charter communities, dispelling myths and putting the focus of this conversation back on what works for children." Check out the 74 for more coverage on the letter and ChartersWork campaign.
Either you educate kids their way, through the one system that they support, or you are wrong.And this method simply won't work if the real aim is to cultivate a learning environment where high-quality education is accesssible to each and every child.
Oh, yes, without a doubt. Because [Dr. King] knew how important a good education was. All the people he surrounded himself with were very well-educated, and had good education, and saw the big picture. And we saw it as a complement to what we were doing….Dr. King saw very instantly and clearly that education was a prime prerequisite for what we were doing, and a complement to the Civil Rights Movement.Interested in Dr. Walker's charter school? Me too! He wrote a book about it, "A Light Shines in Harlem."
The NAACP in 2011 filed a lawsuit with the United Federation of Teachers to prevent the expansion of some New York City charter schools, which are now driving the Empire State’s educational progress. The National Education Association dropped $100,000 in 2014 for a partnership with the NAACP. The unions expect the NAACP’s help in fending off charter competition.This partnership between NAACP and teacher-backed unions was explored further by Mike Antonucci in Intercept. After Diane Ravitch reprinted a letter to the editor of Boston Globe by John L. Reed, chairman of the education committee of the NAACP’s New England Conference, who wrote in opposition of Massachusetts's ballot Question 2— an initiative that would allow the expansion of charter schools in the state by 12 per year—a commentator responded with some pertinent biographical information.
...before becoming the chairman of the education committee of the NAACP’s New England Conference, John L. Reed was once an officer of the Barnstable Teachers Association, a member of the Massachusetts Teachers Association board of directors, a member of the National Education Association board of directors, and chairman of NEA’s Black Caucus. He also was “instrumental” in promoting a partnership between the New England NAACP and MTA.Antonucci notes that "not many people would find this 'disturbing,' but everyone should find it relevant." The WSJ isn't alone in publications that have come out against the NAACP's proposed moratorium. The Washington Post has called out the decision as an "ill-conceived opposition." And has "urge[d] NAACP leadership to put the interests of African American children ahead of the interests of political allies who help finance the group’s activities — and veto this ill-conceived resolution." Of course, not everyone is in agreement that it's such an "ill-conceived opposition." Back to Massachusetts Ballot Question 2. According to Truthout:
Democrats passed a resolution this month opposing charter school expansion. The resolution states that the pro-charter campaign is "funded and governed by hidden money provided by Wall Street executives and hedge fund managers."In response, Liam Kerr, state director for Democrats For Education Reform Massachusetts released a statement:
Democratic leaders, including Hillary Clinton and President Obama support high-quality public charter schools. The Massachusetts party insiders are so out of step they won’t even listen to those who stand with low-income families and families of color desperate for a better education for their children. There was nothing democratic about this vote.The New York Times (NYT) is right. The "debate over race and charters has long been simmering." In an article by Kate Zernike, the NYT explores the divide over charter schools through conversations on race, wealth and access to options with representatives from DFER, NAACP, Movement for Black Lives and Education Post's very own Chris Stewart who comments on his personal mission to find a quality school for his son.
Missing from both platforms is the voice of Black people who choose charter schools, students who are well served by them, educators who work in them, or staff working in education philanthropies that support them. All of those voices qualify as “Black lives,” but, as educational minorities, they are denied their place in two major forums of Black thought.On his blog, Citizen Ed, Stewart gives credence to the voices of Black people who choose charter schools. Parent Gwen Samuels asks, why are parents of color expected to keep sacrificing their kids in unjust schools? and Nekima Levy-Pounds, Black Lives Matter activist, president for the Minneapolis NAACP, civil rights attorney, and charter school parent reminds us on Stewart's Rock the Schools podcast ( read the transcription here) that Black organizations are not monolithic, never have been and never will be.
So for those of you who emailed me yesterday saying that NAACP chapters in various places have gone rogue supporting charters—know that the force of the national organization is NOT on their side.Even the NAACP isn't clear on its own position. Many local NAACP chapters did and still do support public charter schools. And these chapters aren’t going “rogue,” they’re listening to the numbers. In an interview with Roland Martin, charter school founder Steve Perry had this to say on local chapter support:
They [the NAACP] couldn’t be more out of touch if they ran full speed in the other direction. Americans are deciding with their feet that they want to go to better schools. [They are] out of touch even with their own chapters.In fact, Perry claims that in his extensive travels visiting Black communities around the country, local NAACP chapters are the biggest proponents of school choice.
The 2016 NAACP convention voted and approved the following resolution. I am honored it originated from the California Hawaii NAACP, where I serve as Education Chair.It’s no secret that Vasquez Heilig isn’t a supporter of public charter schools. In an interview with Tracy Dell'Angela on his podcast Truth for America, Vasquez Heilig expresses his antipathy for Teach For America (TFA) tied to the presence of charter schools:
There’s the political point which you don’t really want to talk about, which is TFA’s role in private control and privatization. The bottom line is that many of these charter schools could not stay in business without the constant churn of temporary labor [from TFA].Dell'Angela later corrects the record:
It turns out there are plenty of new, traditionally-trained teachers who want to work in charters. And only a third of TFA’s corps members teach in charters.What's more, in Vasquez Heilig's home state of California, district policies supported by teachers unions are actually pushing young, talented teachers to work in charter schools.
The fact that the NAACP wants a national moratorium on charter schools, many of which offer a high-quality education to low-income and working-class black children, is inexplicable.Additionally, Shavar Jeffries, president of Democrats for Education Reform released a statement noting that no one is supporting low-performing or segregating charters:
Indiscriminately targeting all charter schools, even the many great public charter schools that are offering students a bridge to college, while ignoring underperforming district schools, undermines the quality and integrity of our entire education system... We'd be happy to partner with the NAACP to sanction or shut down low-performing charter schools. We'd oppose with the same resolve as the NAACP any charter that seems designed more by a desire to segregate than to innovate.The battle for school choice is complex and certainly divisive but what’s clear is that kids need options and they need them now. This can’t be a battle where politics takes precedence over kids. Like education blogger Chris Stewart has said education reform needs fewer lambs and more lions.
Your donation will support the work we do at brightbeam to shine a light on the voices who challenge decision makers to provide the learning opportunities all children need to thrive.